Weekly Newsletter March 10th to March 14th

RECAPPING LAST WEEK
U.S. equity indices remained under pressure, held captive by trade war drama, geopolitical tensions, and federal budget wrangling. The S&P500 and Nasdaq Composite fell more than 2% despite a strong relief rally into the weekend, while the Russell 2000 slid 1.5%. At Thursday’s lows, the S&P500 had fallen into correction territory, down more than 10% from the record high reached less than one month ago. Gold futures rose above $3,000 per ounce for the first time, driven by the various macroeconomic dislocations triggered by global economic uncertainty. Eight of eleven S&P500 sectors lost ground with discretionary and staples each sinking more than 4%— reflecting concerns over domestic consumption trends. Although February’s U.S. CPI and PPI reports showed a slight moderation in price increases, the anticipated inflationary effects of tariffs continued to weigh heavily on sentiment. One-year inflation expectations soared to an annual rate of 4.9% in March’s preliminary consumer sentiment report, while the sentiment index itself plunged to 57.9, the lowest since November 2022. Long-term inflation expectations rose to 3.9%, the highest level since 1993. At week’s end, investors had little clarity whether the most recent tariff threats against the European Union would end up as policy. U.S. Treasury yields ended slightly lower after rising earlier in the week. Meanwhile, it appeared that a U.S. government shutdown may be averted after the House of Representatives approved a budget measure on Thursday. On the international front, Russia supported in principle a U.S. proposal for a ceasefire in Ukraine, but numerous caveats from the Russian President suggested that negotiations would take some time. German Chancellor-in-waiting Merz announced that he had secured political backing for a massive increase in government borrowing, clearing the first hurdle for the development of enormous defense and infrastructure spending. Former central banker Mark Carney won a landslide victory to lead Canada’s Liberal Party and become the country’s next Prime Minister with a general election likely soon to follow. The Bank of Canada cut its benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 2.75%, warning that the trade conflict with the U.S. could cause severe economic impact and that any further cuts will depend on inflation expectations. Finally, China’s stock indices rallied Friday on hopes for more policy support. An upcoming press conference on measures to boost consumption will include officials from several government bodies. China’s most recent consumer inflation figures showed a monthly and yearly decline for the first time in over a year.
THE WEEK AHEAD
Central banks may regain some of the spotlight this week amid the trade war turmoil, with interest rate decisions due in the U.S., Japan, and the UK. However, macroeconomic concerns remain at the forefront, as investors grapple with stagflation risks due to the U.S. administration’s isolationist economic policies. For the Federal Reserve, sticky inflation and labor market resiliency will likely keep the bar high for the next rate cut, which isn’t expected until June at the earliest. Wednesday’s FOMC statement will include updated economic projections and a new dot plot. Keep an eye out Tuesday for the Atlanta Fed’s latest Q1 GDP estimate—which could be heavily influenced by Monday’s U.S. retail sales report. The domestic economic calendar also features housing data, regional manufacturing surveys, and industrial production figures. Overseas, the Bank of England is also expected to keep interest rates unchanged on Thursday despite a disappointing GDP release last week. The UK’s labor market update for January precedes the BoE statement. Japan’s central bank decision arrives Tuesday evening. Wage growth and consumer prices continue to trend higher, but investors aren’t anticipating another BOJ rate hike until at least July. Japan’s latest national CPI reading arrives later in the week. Last of all, China was scheduled to release industrial production and retail sales figures on Sunday evening.
CHART OF THE WEEK
“Bear” necessities?
The consumer staples ($SP500#30) and consumer discretionary ($SP500#25) sectors are often compared by investors when assessing the U.S. economic outlook. Consumer staples constituents are typically viewed as being less sensitive to macroeconomic conditions; however, they can face compressed profit margins if unable to offset higher costs and inflationary pressures by raising product prices. When consumers feel pinched—as evidenced by deteriorating consumer sentiment—it’s more difficult for firms to raise prices without denting overall demand. Consumer discretionary companies tend to struggle more directly when consumer demand wanes. These firms tend to outperform when macroeconomic factors foster consumer confidence. Historically, this is evident when employment and housing are strong alongside a low-to-stable interest rate environment. This week’s chart shows a performance comparison of each sector over the past year. The shaded box highlights the period from October through December last year, when discretionary meaningfully outperformed staples. This year, staples started out with strong outperformance, but tariffs and more economic uncertainty have seen both sectors slide considerably in March, highlighted by the shaded oval. With the prospect of higher inflation coupled with potential slowing economic growth, the fundamental outlook for consumer sectors has soured, while the technical perspective also looks ominous.

Source: Charles Schwab Corporation
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE AND DISCLOSURE INFORMATION
Investment advisory service is provided by SVL Holding Corporation dba SVL Investments Management (“SVL”), a California registered investment advisor. Advisory services are subject to advisory fees as disclosed on Form ADV.
Investing involves risks, and investment decisions should be based on your own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk. The forecasts or forward-looking statements are based on assumptions, may not materialize, and are subject to revision without notice. International investments carry additional risks, which include differences in financial reporting standards, currency exchange rates, political risks unique to a specific country, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets.
Past performance may not be indicative of future results. Therefore, no current or prospective client should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by SVL) or product made reference to directly or indirectly by SVL in its web site, or indirectly via a link to an unaffiliated third party web site, will be profitable or equal the corresponding indicated performance level(s). Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by SVL), or any non-investment related content, made reference to directly or indirectly on this site will either be suitable or profitable for a client or prospective client’s investment portfolio. Historical performance results for investment indices and/or categories generally do not reflect the deduction of transaction and/or custodial charges, the deduction of an investment management fee, or the impact of taxes, the incurrence of which would have the effect of decreasing historical performance results for investment indices.
Certain portions of SVL‘s web site (i.e. blog, Insights, newsletters, articles, commentaries, etc.) may contain a discussion of, and/or provide access to, SVL‘s (and those of other investment and non-investment professionals) positions and/or recommendations as of a specific prior date. Due to various factors, including changing market conditions, such discussion may no longer be reflective of current position(s) and/or recommendation(s). Moreover, no client or prospective client should assume that any such discussion serves as the receipt of, or a substitute for, personalized advice from SVL or from any other investment professional. SVL is neither an attorney nor accountant, and no portion of the web site content should be interpreted as legal, accounting or tax advice.
Rankings and/or recognition by unaffiliated rating services and/or publications should not be construed by a client or prospective client as a guarantee that he/she will experience a certain level of results if SVL is engaged, or continues to be engaged, to provide investment advisory services, nor should it be construed as a current or past endorsement of SVL by any of its clients. Rankings published by magazines, and others, generally base their selections exclusively on information prepared and/or submitted by the recognized adviser.
To the extent that any client or prospective client utilizes any economic calculator or similar device contained within or linked to SVL‘s web site, the client and/or prospective client acknowledges and understands that the information resulting from the use of any such calculator/device, is not, and should not be construed, in any manner whatsoever, as the receipt of, or a substitute for, personalized individual advice from SVL, or from any other investment professional.
Each client and prospective client agrees, as a condition precedent to his/her/its access to SVL‘s web site, to release and hold harmless SVL, its officers, directors, owners, employees and agents from any and all adverse consequences resulting from any of his/her/its actions and/or omissions which are independent of his/her/its receipt of personalized individual advice from SVL.